Shafaq News
Iraq is facing
a fresh wave of regional pressure after Saudi Arabia struck sites inside the
country and several neighboring states, including Kuwait, Jordan and Syria,
warned Baghdad that any attack launched from Iraqi soil against their territory
would be met with direct military retaliation against armed factions inside the
country.
The warnings,
conveyed through diplomatic channels in recent days, reflect growing alarm that
Iraq is being pulled more into confrontation between the United States and Iran
and its regional allies.
This pressure
follows a string of drone and rocket attacks attributed to Iran-aligned Iraqi
armed factions, targeting interests and installations in neighboring states,
chiefly Saudi Arabia. It has prompted regional calls on Baghdad to prevent
Iraqi territory from being used to threaten the wider region’s security.
In response,
the Iraqi government has insisted it will not allow its territory to be used to
attack neighboring states. Prime Minister and Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces
Ali al-Zaidi, chairing an emergency security meeting on Saturday evening,
stressed the need to prevent any breach or threat originating from Iraq, and
ordered the formation of a joint security committee along with deterrent
mechanisms to prevent further violations.
Al-Zaidi also
directed security and military agencies to raise their level of readiness and
strengthen intelligence and defensive measures, affirming that protecting Iraqi
sovereignty and preventing the country from becoming an arena for settling
regional scores is the exclusive responsibility of official state institutions.
Read more: Wednesday’s US-Saudi attack on Iraq: What Is Known
Regional
Pressure Mounts
Saudi Arabia
announced in recent days that it had intercepted drones it said were launched
from Iraqi airspace toward vital installations inside the kingdom, and
responded, in coordination with US Central Command (CENTCOM), by striking sites
and depots affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) —the
state-affiliated umbrella of largely Iran-aligned armed groups— resulting,
according to the PMF, in 20 deaths and 32 injuries.
Media reports
also indicated that Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Kuwait sent messages to
Baghdad warning that any new attack originating from Iraqi territory would be
met with direct strikes on armed-faction positions inside the country. Several
Gulf states have voiced concern over the continued activity of armed groups
operating outside the government’s decision-making authority, urging Baghdad to
take concrete steps to prevent Iraqi territory from being used in operations
that threaten regional security.
The Islamic
Resistance in Iraq, an umbrella label used by the country’s Iran-aligned armed
factions, denied responsibility for the strikes on Saudi Arabia, stating that
Riyadh was “casting accusations toward Iraq” and that claims linking
the group to the bombing of Saudi oil facilities in the Eastern Province and
Riyadh had no basis in fact.
A lawmaker from
the Sadiqoon bloc, the parliamentary wing of the Iran-aligned Asaib Ahl al-Haq,
and a member of the parliamentary Security and Defense Committee, Sakr
al-Mohammedawi, described the protection of Iraqi sovereignty as a national
priority that admits no compromise, affirming that any targeting of Iraqi
territory by any party constitutes a violation of sovereignty and a breach of
international law.
He told Shafaq
News that security files must be handled through diplomatic channels and
dialogue rather than the language of threats and force, warning that any
military escalation inside Iraq would carry serious consequences for the
security of both the country and the region. He also called on the government
to take the necessary measures to protect national sovereignty, strengthen the
capabilities of the security forces, and intensify diplomatic engagement with
neighboring states and international partners to prevent violations of Iraqi
airspace or territory. “We need a unified national position that keeps
Iraq out of regional conflicts.”
Read more: Iraq’s mediation bid between Washington and Tehran hinges on al-Zaidi’spolitical weight
Drivers of the
Escalation
The
Iran-aligned factions describe their actions as part of a
“resistance” framework against the United States and its regional
allies. This posture has intensified since the outbreak of the war in Gaza on
October 7, 2023, and the rise in tension between Washington and Tehran.
These
developments unfold as the region edges closer to a wider confrontation between
Washington and Tehran. Media reports have indicated that Iran’s Islamic
Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) held contacts with leaders of Iraqi factions,
Lebanon’s Hezbollah, and Yemen’s Houthis to discuss expanding operations in the
event of a full-scale confrontation with the United States, with Tehran
reportedly weighing activation of its regional network to target American bases
and interests in Iraq and Syria to raise the cost of any confrontation for Washington.
Iraqi factions have since raised their readiness levels, while the government
has taken security precautions in anticipation of possible developments in the
field.
Since February
28, 2026, when the United States and Israel launched their war on Iran, Iraqi
groups have claimed responsibility for hundreds of attacks on US bases and
interests in Iraq and the region before their threats expanded to include Gulf
states. Among the most prominent groups in this context are Kataib Hezbollah,
which has repeatedly declared its affiliation with the Axis Of Resistance —the
Iran-led regional alliance of allied states and armed groups— and adopted
rhetoric hostile to the US presence; Harakat al-Nujaba, which maintains an
armed wing and is considered one of the factions closest to Iran; and Kataib
Sayyid al-Shuhada, which rejects relinquishing its military capabilities
outside full state control.
Positions
diverge, however, on the issue of restricting weapons to the state: some
factions have shown willingness to engage politically or reorganize their
relationship with the state, while others refuse to give up their arsenals,
viewing them as part of their ideological and regional role. Asaib Ahl al-Haq,
by contrast, has moved further into formal political life, placing it in a more
delicate position between political engagement and retaining military
influence.
Read more: Iraq’s September deadline undercuts armed factions’ case for weapons
Iran’s Network
of Influence
Observers
interviewed by Shafaq News view these factions as part of a broader regional
network backed by Iran, which uses them as leverage against the United States
and its allies. Security expert and strategic analyst Alaa al-Nashou expressed
that Iraq has become a “battlefield” because of the direct war
between the United States and Iran that erupted on February 28, 2026,
“with Tehran viewing the Iraqi arena as an influential card in any
confrontation with Washington.”
He noted that
the presence of an “Iran-linked military arsenal inside Iraq,” and
its ability to strike targets Tehran considers relevant to the conflict, has
made the country part of the wider regional confrontation equation. “The
problem lies in the fact that some of the targets these factions strike are
located inside neighboring Arab states bound to Iraq by ties, borders and
agreements,” he said, adding that this factor places Baghdad before legal
and political responsibilities toward those states.
Iranian
influence within parts of Iraq’s security and military apparatus, he argued,
has placed the government in a difficult position and given neighboring states,
particularly Arab ones, justification to act against threats emanating from
Iraqi territory. Al-Nashou noted that these factions “fall under the
authority of the commander-in-chief of the armed forces” according to law
and the constitution, placing the Iraqi government under a legal responsibility
to prevent any military activity outside the state’s decision.
“Any
military action by neighboring states inside Iraqi territory represents a
violation of Iraqi sovereignty, but respect for Iraq’s sovereignty must be
matched by Iraq’s respect for the sovereignty of other states and by preventing
its territory from being used to launch attacks against them.”
Al-Nashou
warned that continuation along this path risks dragging Iraq and its people
into a conflict that serves no national interest, emphasizing that the
country’s distance from regional and international wars is “the pinnacle
of patriotism.”
The Language of
Sovereignty
For their part,
Iran-aligned armed factions reject characterizations of Iraq as an open arena
for foreign interference.
Hussein
al-Shihani, a member of the political bureau of the Sadiqoon Movement, led by
Qais al-Khazali, refused, in an interview with Shafaq News, that Iraq is
“a violable arena, nor a state without a decision,” affirming that
any assault on Iraqi territory constitutes an assault on its sovereignty.
“Iraq
possesses institutions and armed forces capable of defending it,” he said,
stressing support for building a strong state and keeping the decision of war
and peace exclusively in the government’s hands. At the same time, al-Shihani
insisted that calls for state-building should not be understood as weakness or
retreat in the face of external threats. The factions, he said, “do not
want escalation, but they do not fear it either,” warning any party
considering aggression against Iraq that it would bear the consequences, while
calling for a more effective and prominent Iraqi diplomatic role commensurate
with the scale of regional and international developments.
That confidence
sits uneasily against the facts on the ground. Baghdad bears constitutional
responsibility for forces it does not fully command, while its neighbors have
shown they will strike inside Iraq without waiting for it to act, and the war
between Iran and a US-Israeli coalition has narrowed the diplomatic space every
party still invokes. Al-Zaidi’s government has ordered committees and raised readiness,
but whether it can close the gap between the state’s formal authority and the
factions’ operational autonomy is the question the next attack, from whichever
direction, will answer.
Read more: Lebanon’s Hezbollah shifts from battlefield to political fight over weapons
Written and
edited by Shafaq News staff.