U.S. and Zambia Feud: Trump Health Aid Deal Stalls Over Critical Minerals

An explosive public feud has broken out this week between the United States and Zambia.

The two nations were negotiating a deal to provide billions of dollars in U.S. health funding, but the outgoing U.S. ambassador publicly accused the Zambian government last week of graft and negotiating in bad faith.

Zambia’s foreign minister fired back on Monday, accusing the United States of linking aid to access to the critical minerals of the southern African nation.

The tussle spotlights the Trump administration’s push to overhaul U.S. foreign aid, replacing the foreign assistance provided by the United States Agency for International Development with an “America First” alternative. Mr. Trump, along with tech tycoon Elon Musk, dismantled the aid agency last year, accusing it of being wasteful.

The Trump administration has said countries should shoulder more of their own health funding, and that about two dozen African countries have already signed agreements. But a number have also walked away, citing the United States’ request for private health data, among other issues.

Zambia, Ghana and Zimbabwe have all turned down the Trump administration. Kenya signed, but the deal is being held up in court.

“Any deal that is exchanging human lives for access to critical minerals is immoral,” said Jonas Chanda, the former Zambian health minister.

Zambia is among the world’s major copper producers and has large reserves of minerals like lithium and cobalt.

Some analysts say that the Trump administration is pressuring Zambia to provide mining access to American companies in a nation where China currently dominates. A draft of the health provisions in the deal, obtained by The New York Times, contain stipulations that would grant American businesses greater access to Zambia’s mineral deposits, effectively ending China’s hold.

But in his remarks, outgoing U.S. ambassador, Michael Gonzales, said Washington was not trying to leverage foreign aid into greater access to Zambia’s mines.

“Any suggestion that the United States would withhold critical lifesaving health care support from those Zambians whose lives, whose health depend on it, unless we get critical minerals, is disgusting,” he said during a farewell speech. “It is absolutely, patently false.”

Zambia’s foreign minister, Mulambo Haimbe, said in a six-page response that the issue of critical minerals had been a major roadblock in the negotiations, adding that Mr. Gonzales had made untrue statements to distort “the real reasons” for the stalled talks.

Mr. Haimbe said that as Mr. Gonzales has approached the end of his tenure in Zambia, he has engaged in “a deliberate shift away from diplomatic etiquette and an increasingly acrimonious change in attitude.”

Appointed in 2022 by President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Mr. Gonzales is a career diplomat who has openly embraced Mr. Trump’s agenda in his second term. He held a tearful news conference last year announcing that the United States would cut $50 million in annual aid for medicines and medical supplies to Zambia, saying that an assessment had found “systematic theft” of U.S.-donated drugs intended for free distribution.

“We are no longer willing to underwrite the personal enrichment of fraudsters or the corrupt,” Mr. Gonzales said at the time.

In January, he published an essay on the State Department’s newsletter platform, arguing that America’s model of foreign aid had failed to deliver tangible benefits and had enabled government corruption. He suggested attaching more accountability to American aid.

“Virtually never did we withhold assistance funds because host governments failed to deliver on their commitments,” he wrote. “Instead, we responded by providing even more aid.” It’s unclear whether Mr. Gonzales will remain in the State Department once he leaves Zambia.

David Monyae, the director of the Center of China-Africa Studies at the University of Johannesburg, said that Mr. Gonzales’s remarks may backfire by pushing Zambia closer to China. The Zambian government is the one “in the region that is most pro-U.S.,” Mr. Monyae said. “That’s the irony of this case.”

When Hakainde Hichilema became president of Zambia five years ago, he won praise in the United States as a former political prisoner who promised to fight corruption. “That love is gone,” Anthony Mukwita, a former Zambian diplomat who now runs a communications consultancy, said.

Mr. Hichilema has since been heavily criticized for cracking down on his opponents. Last month, his government indefinitely postponed RightsCon, an international human rights summit scheduled in Lusaka, the capital, citing that certain topics did not align with Zambian values. The summit’s organizers said that China had pressured Zambia to cancel the conference because a Taiwanese activist was scheduled to appear.

Some Zambians said that Mr. Gonzales may have unintentionally forced the government to be more transparent about what’s in the deal. The first time the Zambian government suggested that critical minerals were part of negotiations was in the foreign minister’s statement, said Linda Kasonde, a Zambian human rights lawyer.

Ms. Kasonde is leading an organization that has sued to stop a deal from being ratified without approval from Parliament. She said that Mr. Gonzales’s accusations of government corruption were nothing new. “Few people are saying it out loud in a way that tries to hold the government accountable,” she said.