Dear Editor,
I read with interest the article titled ” ‘Did he apply?’: PNP raises questions over Anderson’s NaRRA appointment”, published on May 27, 2026, and I believe the reaction from the Opposition People’s National Party says more about Jamaica’s increasingly toxic political culture than it does about the appointment itself.
The real issue should not be whether Ambassador Major General (ret’d) Antony Anderson formally applied for the position. The real question is whether he possesses the qualifications, leadership experience, and administrative competence necessary to serve in the role.
On that matter, there should be little debate.
Anderson has served Jamaica at the highest levels of national leadership as chief of defence staff of the Jamaica Defence Force, commissioner of police, and is currently Jamaica’s ambassador to the United States. Few Jamaicans can match that level of experience in security management, public administration, diplomacy, and strategic leadership.
In both the public and private sectors, highly qualified individuals are frequently identified and recruited for senior leadership roles because of their proven track record and expertise. That is not unusual, improper, or unprecedented. Serious organisations actively seek out competent people to strengthen institutions and improve performance.
Unfortunately, in Jamaica, we have developed a dangerous habit of reducing every national appointment to political theatre and manufactured outrage. The implication now being advanced is that once someone is appointed by a government, his/her qualifications suddenly become secondary to political speculation. That approach does a disservice not only to the individual involved, but also to the country itself. It discourages competent professionals from public service and undermines confidence in our institutions
Jamaicans are far more interested in whether National Reconstruction and Resilience Authority (NaRRA) can effectively deliver results, operate transparently, and contribute positively to national development than in partisan talking points designed for political consumption.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with every decision Anderson made during his years in public life, no fair-minded person can seriously argue that he lacks the experience, discipline, or leadership capacity to serve Jamaica.
If we are serious about nation-building, then merit, competence, and proven leadership must matter more than political noise.
Christopher McCurdy
kristophe60@hotmail.com