US steps up pressure on Sudan’s warring generals — The National
The United States is increasing pressure on the leaders of the opposing sides in Sudan’s civil war and says that Sudanese Armed Forces commander General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Rapid Support Forces leader General Mohamed Dagalo should have no role in the country’s future governance. The National reports.
US Special Envoy for Arab and African Affairs Massad Boulos said there is “no future” for Sudan’s two military leaders. Both are under US sanctions and face accusations of serious violations.
Pressure on military leadership
The United States continues to support a ceasefire roadmap agreed last year by the so-called Quartet: the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United States. At the same time, Boulos acknowledged that diplomatic efforts had produced no results over the past year.
In recent weeks, Washington has notably promoted the idea of extending the UN arms embargo to all of Sudan. It currently applies only to the Darfur region. The UN Security Council gave member states one month to discuss the US proposal. The United States has also taken measures against the Sudanese government over the possible use of chemical weapons.
Areig Elhag, a Sudan analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, said the latest US steps indicate a shift from the previous approach, under which Washington sought to maintain a balance between the sides in the conflict. According to her, this does not mean the United States is more favorably disposed toward the Rapid Support Forces.
More current news is available on the UA.News Telegram channel Telegram.
Positions of the sides and the humanitarian crisis
In January 2025, the Joe Biden administration accused the Rapid Support Forces of genocide, and this assessment has remained under the Donald Trump administration. The Rapid Support Forces said they were ready for a 90-day humanitarian truce but rejected certain provisions concerning the withdrawal of forces.
General al-Burhan, for his part, pledged to continue fighting until the Rapid Support Forces are defeated. Elhag noted that he does not make decisions alone, since his camp includes armed groups, Islamists and other political forces.
As the outlet writes, reports by The New York Times and The Washington Post indicated that the Sudanese Armed Forces may have used chemical weapons and created a secret stockpile of such weapons, which they later tried to conceal. A UN fact-finding report this month also referred to the Sudanese Armed Forces’ use of foreign-made drones in operations that harmed civilians.
The war in Sudan has claimed tens of thousands of lives, forced millions of people to flee their homes and caused one of the world’s largest humanitarian crises. According to an estimate cited in the article, about 20 million people are suffering from hunger.
Download our app
Credit: Source link